|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:54 pm
|
Nathan Explosions Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Hm. Interesting thought. Let's see... Nathan: Conservative. He likes his stability, and too much change makes him uncomfortable. He would stick to the tried and true, and, for all his talk about going forth and fighting and s**t, I think he'd try to avoid upheaval as much as possible.
Murderface: Right wing/ambivalent. He comes across as a total redneck; in US politics, he'd support the republicans, but he'd support ********' Joseph Stalin too as long as he could keep his guns and his cars.
Skwisgaar: Centre-left. He's a neat little control freak when it comes to certain things, but in areas of personal freedoms like drug use, sexual freedom, free speech, etc, he'd pretty much say anything goes. Not only for his own benefit, but because not much offends him. Growing up in Sweden probably gave him a pretty progressive, democratic world view.
Pickles: Anarchist. Although he rejects the idea of democracy, he does so because he feels government is a hindrance to enjoying life. He's one of those optimistic anarchists who wishes government should be replaced by voluntary cooperation and respect for each other.
Toki: It's complicated. He struggles with his extreme religious upbringing. Although outwardly he rages against it, claiming to be a nihilist who doesn't believe in anything, inwardly he is guided by traditional family values and the desire for a simple life. He'd never try to take power, but if it fell into his lap he'd let off the steam of his repressive childhood by being the most capricious despot the world has ever seen.
Guh, that was long. But you asked. I had to think it all out. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|