|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:48 pm
|
|
|
|
While I am not fluent in a foreign language I was subjected to classes in other languages. Now maybe it's because I didn't have a real aptitude for these other languages, or maybe it's because I didn't actually become fluent in them, but I didn't find what little schooling I had in another language to be a benefit to my English grammar.
What did help, believe it or not, was instant messaging. I know, I know, who would have thought it could be true. In my case this is why it worked: Instant messaging forces you to evaluate what constitutes a sentence. If what you're typing is important enough to get sent off all at once, so that you don't want to hit enter in the middle, then it's probably a sentence. If you can hit enter and continue on without feeling dirty then there was probably more than one sentence there. Admittedly this will only work if you already have an inherent desire for good grammar; but, so long as things are getting typed out fully, I would endorse instant messaging as a useful tool for teaching at least some basic level of grammar. But that's just me, and I'm a little crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:47 pm
|
|
|
|
Again, it's not English grammar you're learning. It's basic grammar.
Subjects, objects, verbs, nouns, adjectives, prepositions, adverbs, etc. exist in other languages. They don't teach grammar so much in later years of English because you've spoken it all your life; you should be fluent.
Foreign languages, though, require you to have a much deeper understanding of grammars; they use one language to teach another, so the only real way to teach it is to compare grammars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:06 pm
|
|
|
|
[Mammon] While I am not fluent in a foreign language I was subjected to classes in other languages. Now maybe it's because I didn't have a real aptitude for these other languages, or maybe it's because I didn't actually become fluent in them, but I didn't find what little schooling I had in another language to be a benefit to my English grammar. What did help, believe it or not, was instant messaging. I know, I know, who would have thought it could be true. In my case this is why it worked: Instant messaging forces you to evaluate what constitutes a sentence. If what you're typing is important enough to get sent off all at once, so that you don't want to hit enter in the middle, then it's probably a sentence. If you can hit enter and continue on without feeling dirty then there was probably more than one sentence there. Admittedly this will only work if you already have an inherent desire for good grammar; but, so long as things are getting typed out fully, I would endorse instant messaging as a useful tool for teaching at least some basic level of grammar. But that's just me, and I'm a little crazy. Wow, that's pretty interesting. *scratches head*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|