|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Joss-Box Before you answer with and angry "no," let me explain. I hate fragments too. But in the case of creativity, do you think it would be OK? What I mean is, if a writer is going for an effect, is it OK to let those fragments slide. If you think it is OK, when is it TOO much?
I tend to use fragments a lot during conversations via messengers and such. In cordial, formal writing, however, no matter how much of a dramatic effect the writer's going for, I can't stand fragments. They jump out at my eyes and I want to strangle whichever editor overlooked it. Then again, I tend to be a bit Grammar-O.C.D. sometimes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:42 pm
|
|
|
|
It really depends on the context. In formal, academic research papers, it's best to avoid them. Whenever dialogue is involved, fragments are bound to start springing up, unless you want your characters to sound stiff and lifeless. Sometimes, in a narration, they can be used for good dramatic effect, but, as with anything, they can be overused, at which point they become insipid and annoying.
(Poetry is to far removed from prose in most cases for the idea of a sentence to apply.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|